🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.